The effect of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on gynecologic oncology: comparison between a clinical and a non-clinical sample

The effect of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on gynecologic oncology: comparison between a clinical and a non-clinical sample

Blog Article

Objective: This study aimed to examine the differences of cognitive emotion regulation (CER) strategies between patients with gynecologic cancer and non-clinical individuals.Methods: A cohort of 329 female adults was recruited in this study.About 179 patients with gynecologic cancer were allocated to the clinical group and 150 healthy women were allocated to the non-clinical group.All the participants Polyphenol completed a demographic survey and the Chinese version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-C).Results: There were statistically significant group differences in the CER strategies used between the two groups.

The most prevalent discrepancies of the CER strategies across the two samples were the self-blame, rumination, putting into perspective, catastrophizing, and blaming others.Further logistic regression analyzes indicated that these four strategies have significant and independent contributions to the prediction of group membership.In particular, a higher reported use of self-blame and blaming others, and a lower reported use of acceptance and putting into perspective, were observed for the clinical group.The CER strategies in the clinical group, which differentiated it from the non-clinical group, accounted Bolero Hat for 23.9% of the variance, after controlling for the non-dominant variables.

Conclusion: The implications of certain CER strategies may be a useful target for prevention and intervention of psychological distress on patients with gynecologic cancer.